.

0 (hodnocen0 x )

EB

EB

ONLINE

Brno : Masarykova univerzita, 2022

1 online zdroj (176 stran)

ISBN 978-80-280-0039-4 (online ; pdf)

ISBN 978-80-280-0038-7 (print)

Tato studie zkoumá vzájemnou souhru polysémie, kontextu, pojmu a konstruování, přičemž pro ilustraci využívá konstrukční schéma [V] – [UP] (angličtina) a [V] – [SHANG] (čínština). Kromě této kognitivně sémantické analýzy se kniha zabývá též dvěma hlavními východisky kognitivní lingvistiky. Na jednu stranu jde o přesvědčení, že význam do značné míry závisí na archetypálním pojímání, což odráží základní kognitivní dispozice člověka. Současně je však subjektivita vnímána jako klíčový prvek při studiu lexikální sémantiky, a to nejen v tom ohledu, že role konceptualizujícího subjektu (tj. mluvčího) je výchozí při každém užití jazyka, ale také s ohledem na nezbytnost subjektivního mentálního „scanningu“ v porozumění výrazně utlumeným lexikálním významům..

001657523

1 Language, Space and Thought 9 // 1.1 Problem statement 9 // 1.2 The study of up from a cross-linguistic perspective 11 // 1.3 The conceptual significance of up and shang 13 // 1.4 A corpus-based approach 14 // 2 Literature Review 17 // 2.1 Polysemy as contextualized patterns of meaning 17 // 2.2 Context 19 // 2.2.1 Co-text 19 // 2.2.2 Encyclopedic knowledge and experiential domain 21 // 2.3 Previous studies on up 23 // 2.3.1 A Cognitive Grammar approach to up 23 // 2.3.2 A Contemporary Theory of Metaphor approach to up 24 // 2.3.3 A Principled Polysemy approach to up 24 // 2.4 Previous studies on shang 24 // 2.4.1 A Conceptual Structure approach to shang 25 // 2.4.2 A Contemporary Theory of Metaphor approach to shang 25 // 2.4.3 A Principled Polysemy approach to shang 25 // 2.4.4 A Corpus linguistic approach to shang as a locative particle 26 // 2.5 PP: A semantics-based model of polysemy 26 // 2.5.1 Tyler and Evans" (2003) version of PP 26 // 2.5.2 Evans" (2004) revision of PP 27 // 2.6 Semantic valence in CG 28 // 3 Data and Methodology 31 // 3.1 Analytical framework 31 // 3.2 Data collection 33 // 3.3 Procedures of sense decision and description 34 // 3.4 Delimitations of the present study 34 // 4 The Core Senses of Up 35 // 4.1 Core senses and the Meaning Criterion 35 // 4.1.1 "Vertically higher" 35 // 4.1.2 "Approaching" 36 // 4.1.3 "Completive" 37 // 4.2 Decision of the sanctioning sense 37 // 4.3 The core senses of up and their associated constructional schemas 39 // 4.3.1 "Vertically higher" and its associated constructional schemas 39 // 4.3.1.1 Constructional schemas of vertically higher" that // profile exclusively path 40 // 4.3.1.2 Constructional schemas of "vertically higher" that profile path and either goal or source 41 // 4.3.2 "Approaching" and its associated constructional schemas 44 //

4.3.2.1 Constructional schemas of"approaching" that profile path // and a concrete goal 44 // 4.3.2.2 Constructional schemas of "approaching" that profile path and an implicit goal 46 // 4.3.2.3 Constructional schemas of "approaching" that profiles only // an implicit goal 48 // 4.3.2.4 Interim summary for "approaching" 50 // 4.3.3 "Completive" in [V] - [UP] and its sources of concept elaboration 50 // 4.3.3.1 The verb as the source of concept elaboration for "completive" 51 // 4.3.3.2 A noun phrase as the source of concept elaboration for "completive" 54 // 4.3.3.3 A prepositional phrase as the source of concept elaboration // for "completive" 55 // 4.3.3.4 Underspecified but inferable endpoints 56 // 4.3.3.5 Interim summary for "completive" 58 // 4.3.4 Summary of the chapter 60 // 5 The Metaphorical Senses of Up 63 // 5.1 "Accessible" 63 // 5.1.1 "Accessible" and the Meaning Criterion 64 // 5.1.2 "Accessible" and its associated constructional schemas 65 // 5.1.2.1 NP as the source of concept elaboration for "accessible" 65 // 5.1.2.2 The verb as the source of concept elaboration for "accessible" .68 // 5.1.3 Between "accessible" and "completive" 69 // 5.2 "More" 71 // 5.2.1 "More" and the Meaning Criterion 71 // 5.2.2 "More" and its associated constructional schemas 72 // 5.2.2.1 "More" in a PATH-prominent constructional schema 72 // 5.2.2.2 "More" in a path- and souRCE-prominent constructional schema ..73 // 5.2.2.3 "More" in path- and GOAL-prominent constructional schemas 74 // 5.2.3 Beyond the domain of quantity into the event stricture level 78 // 5.3 "Happy" 81 // 5.3.1 "Happy" and the Meaning Criterion 81 // 5.3.2 "Happy" and its associated constructional schema 81 // 5.4 "Good" 82 // 5.4.1 "Good" and the Meaning Criterion 83 // 5.4.2 "Good" and its associated constructional schemas 83 // 5.4.2.1 An NP as the source of concept elaboration for "good" 84 //

5.4.2.2 The verb as the source of concept elaboration for "good" 85 // 5.4.3 Between "good" and "completive" 86 // 5.5 Summary of the chapter 87 // 6 The Core Senses of Shang 89 // 6.1 Core senses of shdng and the Meaning Criterion 90 // 6.1.1 "Vertically attained" 90 // 6.1.2 "Vertically higher" 92 // 6.1.3 "Forward" 93 // 6.1.4 "Attached" 95 // 6.1.5 "Completive" 97 // 6.1.6 "Inceptive" 100 // 6.2 Decision of the sanctioning sense 103 // 6.3 The core senses of shdng and their associated constructional schemas 105 // 6.3.1 "Vertically attained" and its associated constructional schemas 105 // 6.3.2 "Vertically higher" and its associated constructional schema 107 // 6.3.3 "Forward" and its associated constructional schemas 108 // 6.3.4 "Attached" and its associated constructional schemas 112 // 6.3.5 "Completive" and its associated constructional schemas 117 // 6.3.6 "Inceptive" and its associated constructional schemas 122 // 6.4 Summary of the chapter 125 // 7 Subjectification, Attenuation and Conceptual Archetypes 129 // 7.1 Subjectivity and subjectification 130 // 7.2 Subjectification and attenuation in the semantic extension of up and shdng 135 // 7.2.1 Change in status in the semantic extension of up and shdng 135 // 7.2.2 Change in focus in the semantic extension of up and shdng 139 // 7.2.3 Change in domain in the semantic extension of up and shdng 142 // 7.2.4 Change in the locus of activity or potency in the semantic // extension of up and shdng 142 // 7.2.5 Interim summary for the semantic extension of up and shdng 145 // 7.3 Domains, co-text and semantic attenuation 146 // 7.4 Conceptual archetypes in the embodied meanings of up and shdng 147 // 7.4.1 Archetypal conception and the core meanings of up 147 // 7.4.2 Archetypal conception and the core meanings of shdng 148 // 7.4.3 Schematized archetypal meaning in the metaphorical meanings of up 149 //

8 The Making of Lexical Meaning 151 // 8.1 Lexical semantics in cross-linguistic comparison 152 // 8.2 Residence of meaning in basic human cognitive abilities 153 // 8.3 Limitations and further studies 155 // Summary 157 // N*Ai 163 // Bibliography 167 // List of Tables 175 // List of Figures 175 // List of Abbreviations 176