.

0 (hodnocen0 x )

EB

ONLINE

1st ed.

Seattle : University of Washington Press, 2012

1 online resource (xiii, 351 p.) : ill., plans

ISBN 9780295804484 (electronic bk.)

ISBN 9780295992136 (hardback)

A China program book

Outgrowth of the author’s thesis (Ph.D.--University of Washington)

Includes bibliographical references and index

The History of Chang’an Avenue in an Urban Context -- National versus Modern: The 1950s -- Collective Creation: The 1964 Chang’an Avenue Planning -- Modernization in a Postmodern World: The 1970s and 1980s -- Collage without Planning: Toward the New Millennium -- Chang’an Avenue and the Axes of Beijing -- Conclusion: Chang’an Avenue in a Global Context.

"In this interdisciplinary narrative, the never-ending "completion" of China’s most important street offers a broad view of the relationship between art and ideology in modern China. Chang’an Avenue, named after China’s ancient capital (whose name means "Eternal Peace"), is supremely symbolic. Running east-west through the centuries-old heart of Beijing, it intersects the powerful north-south axis that links the traditional centers of political and spiritual legitimacy (the imperial Forbidden City and the Temple of Heaven). Among its best-known features are Tiananmen Square and the Great Hall of the People, as well as numerous other monuments and prominent political, cultural, financial, and travel-related institutions. Drawing on Chang’an Avenue’s historic ties and modern transformations, this study explores the deep structure of the Chinese modernization project, providing both a big picture of Beijing’s urban texture alteration and details in the design process of individual buildings.Political winds shift, architectural styles change, and technological innovations influence waves of demolition and reconstruction in this analysis of Chang’an Avenue’s metamorphosis. During collective design processes, architects, urban planners, and politicians argue about form, function, and theory, and about Chinese vs. Western and traditional vs. modern style. Every decision is fraught with political significance, from the 1950s debate over whether Tiananmen Square should be open or partially closed; to the 1970s discussion of the proper location, scale, and design of the Mao Memorial/Mausoleum; to the more recent controversy over whether the egg-shaped National Theater, designed by the French architect Paul Andreu, is an affront to Chinese national pride.Shuishan Yu is associate professor of art history at Oakland University in Rochester, Michigan."-- Provided by publisher..

Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2015. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries

001838614

full

(Au-PeEL)EBL3444505

(CaONFJC)MIL810339

(CaPaEBR)ebr10643258

(MiAaPQ)EBC3444505

(OCoLC)824564501