Úplné zobrazení záznamu

Toto je statický export z katalogu ze dne 11.05.2024. Zobrazit aktuální podobu v katalogu.

Bibliografická citace

.
0 (hodnocen0 x )
EB
ONLINE
Cham : Springer International Publishing AG, 2022
1 online resource (290 pages)
Externí odkaz    Plný text PDF 
   * Návod pro vzdálený přístup 


ISBN 9783030892890 (electronic bk.)
ISBN 9783030892883
Print version: Devlin, Nancy Value Sets for EQ-5D-5L Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2022 ISBN 9783030892883
Chapter 3: Experimental Design for the Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 EQ-VT Designs -- 3.2.1 cTTO Design -- 3.2.2 DCE Design -- 3.2.3 Other Considerations -- 3.3 Alternative cTTO Designs -- 3.4 Future Research -- Appendices -- Appendix A: Construction for Level Balance Optimisation Criterion -- Appendix B: The cTTO design of the EQ-VT -- Appendix C: The DCE design of the EQ-VT -- Appendix D: The Design Used in the Peruvian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study -- References -- Chapter 4: EQ-5D-5L Value Set Summaries -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Methods -- 4.3 Country-by-Country Overview of Value Sets -- 4.3.1 Wave 1 -- 4.3.1.1 Country/Region: Canada (Table 4.1) -- 4.3.1.2 Country/Region: China (Table 4.5) -- 4.3.1.3 Country/Region: England (Table 4.9) -- 4.3.1.4 Country/Region: Netherlands (Table 4.13) -- 4.3.1.5 Country/Region: Spain (Table 4.17) -- 4.3.2 Wave 2 ---
4.3.2.1 Country/Region: Japan (Table 4.21) -- 4.3.2.2 Country/Region: Korea (Table 4.25) -- 4.3.2.3 Country/Region: Thailand (Table 4.29).
Chapter 3: Experimental Design for the Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 EQ-VT Designs -- 3.2.1 cTTO Design -- 3.2.2 DCE Design -- 3.2.3 Other Considerations -- 3.3 Alternative cTTO Designs -- 3.4 Future Research -- Appendices -- Appendix A: Construction for Level Balance Optimisation Criterion -- Appendix B: The cTTO design of the EQ-VT -- Appendix C: The DCE design of the EQ-VT -- Appendix D: The Design Used in the Peruvian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study -- References -- Chapter 4: EQ-5D-5L Value Set Summaries -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Methods -- 4.3 Country-by-Country Overview of Value Sets -- 4.3.1 Wave 1 -- 4.3.1.1 Country/Region: Canada (Table 4.1) -- 4.3.1.2 Country/Region: China (Table 4.5) -- 4.3.1.3 Country/Region: England (Table 4.9) -- 4.3.1.4 Country/Region: Netherlands (Table 4.13) -- 4.3.1.5 Country/Region: Spain (Table 4.17) -- 4.3.2 Wave 2 ---
Intro -- Foreword by Michael Drummond -- Foreword by Kim Rand -- Preface -- Acknowledgements -- Contents -- About the Editors -- Contributors -- Chapter 1: The Development of the EQ-5D-5L and its Value Sets -- 1.1 The EQ-5D as an Instrument for Measuring and Valuing Health -- 1.2 The Development of the EQ-5D-5L -- 1.3 The need for EQ-5D-5L Values -- 1.4 The Aims of this Book -- References -- Chapter 2: The Development and Strengthening of Methods for Valuing EQ-5D-5L - An Overview -- 2.1 Development of the EQ-VT Protocol -- 2.2 Description of the EQ-VT Protocol -- 2.2.1 Contents of the Protocol -- 2.2.2 Why the cTTO Task was Adopted -- 2.2.3 Why the DCE Task was Adopted -- 2.2.4 Value Set Generation -- 2.3 How the EQ-VT Protocol Updates Evolved -- 2.4 Lessons Learned -- 2.5 Concluding Remarks -- References ---
5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 Which Value Set Should Be Used to Estimate QALYs? - An Overview -- 5.2.1 End Users’ Requirements and Recommendations -- 5.2.2 Relevance to the Population to Whom the Analysis Refers -- 5.2.3 Empirical Characteristics of the Value Sets -- 5.2.4 Transparency and Uncertainty -- 5.3 Which Value Set to Use in ’Non-QALY’ Applications - An Overview -- 5.4 Choosing Value Sets - Some Further Considerations -- 5.4.1 Relevance to the Decision-Making Context -- 5.4.2 The Theoretical Properties of Values and Value Sets -- 5.5 Concluding Remarks -- References -- Chapter 6: How Do EQ-5D-5L Value Sets Differ? -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Methods -- 6.2.1 Analysing Differences Between Value Sets -- 6.2.2 Defining Preference Patterns and the Performance of These Patterns -- 6.3 Differences Between Value Sets ---
4.3.2.4 Country/Region: Uruguay (Table 4.33) -- 4.3.2.5 Country/Region: Hong Kong (Table 4.37) -- 4.3.3 Wave 3 -- 4.3.3.1 Country/Region: France (Table 4.41) -- 4.3.3.2 Country/Region: Germany (Table 4.45) -- 4.3.3.3 Country/Region: Indonesia (Table 4.49) -- 4.3.3.4 Country/Region: Ireland (Table 4.53) -- 4.3.3.5 Country/Region: Malaysia (Table 4.57) -- 4.3.3.6 Country/Region: Poland (Table 4.61) -- 4.3.3.7 Country/Region: Portugal (Table 4.65) -- 4.3.3.8 Country/Region: Taiwan (Table 4.69) -- 4.3.3.9 Country/Region: Denmark (Table 4.73) -- 4.3.3.10 Country/Region: Ethiopia (Table 4.77) -- 4.3.3.11 Country/Region: Hungary (Table 4.81) -- 4.3.3.12 Country/Region: Mexico (Table 4.85) -- 4.3.3.13 Country/Region: Peru (Table 4.89) -- 4.3.3.14 Country/Region: United States (Table 4.93) -- 4.3.3.15 Country/Region: Vietnam (Table 4.97) -- Chapter 5: Guidance to Users of EQ-5D-5L Value Sets ---
5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 Which Value Set Should Be Used to Estimate QALYs? - An Overview -- 5.2.1 End Users’ Requirements and Recommendations -- 5.2.2 Relevance to the Population to Whom the Analysis Refers -- 5.2.3 Empirical Characteristics of the Value Sets -- 5.2.4 Transparency and Uncertainty -- 5.3 Which Value Set to Use in ’Non-QALY’ Applications - An Overview -- 5.4 Choosing Value Sets - Some Further Considerations -- 5.4.1 Relevance to the Decision-Making Context -- 5.4.2 The Theoretical Properties of Values and Value Sets -- 5.5 Concluding Remarks -- References -- Chapter 6: How Do EQ-5D-5L Value Sets Differ? -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Methods -- 6.2.1 Analysing Differences Between Value Sets -- 6.2.2 Defining Preference Patterns and the Performance of These Patterns -- 6.3 Differences Between Value Sets ---
6.3.1 Relative Importance of the Dimensions -- 6.3.2 Marginal Value Decrements of Moving from One Level to Another.
4.3.2.4 Country/Region: Uruguay (Table 4.33) -- 4.3.2.5 Country/Region: Hong Kong (Table 4.37) -- 4.3.3 Wave 3 -- 4.3.3.1 Country/Region: France (Table 4.41) -- 4.3.3.2 Country/Region: Germany (Table 4.45) -- 4.3.3.3 Country/Region: Indonesia (Table 4.49) -- 4.3.3.4 Country/Region: Ireland (Table 4.53) -- 4.3.3.5 Country/Region: Malaysia (Table 4.57) -- 4.3.3.6 Country/Region: Poland (Table 4.61) -- 4.3.3.7 Country/Region: Portugal (Table 4.65) -- 4.3.3.8 Country/Region: Taiwan (Table 4.69) -- 4.3.3.9 Country/Region: Denmark (Table 4.73) -- 4.3.3.10 Country/Region: Ethiopia (Table 4.77) -- 4.3.3.11 Country/Region: Hungary (Table 4.81) -- 4.3.3.12 Country/Region: Mexico (Table 4.85) -- 4.3.3.13 Country/Region: Peru (Table 4.89) -- 4.3.3.14 Country/Region: United States (Table 4.93) -- 4.3.3.15 Country/Region: Vietnam (Table 4.97) -- Chapter 5: Guidance to Users of EQ-5D-5L Value Sets ---
6.3.3 Scale Length and Location of the Descriptive Midpoint on the Health Utility Scale -- 6.4 Identifying Preference Patterns -- 6.5 How Do These Preference Patterns Perform? -- 6.6 Discussion -- 6.6.1 Main Findings -- 6.6.2 Preference Patterns -- 6.6.3 Data Quality and Modelling Strategies -- 6.6.4 Differences Between Value Sets Between and Within Preference Patterns -- 6.6.5 Limitations -- 6.7 Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 7: Where Next for EQ-5D-5L National Value Sets and the EQ-VT Protocol? -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Future Directions for Improvements in the EQ-VT - An Overview -- 7.2.1 What Methods to Use? -- 7.2.2 Procedural Aspects -- 7.2.3 Analysis and Modelling -- 7.3 Developing Alternative Approaches and Answering Different Questions -- 7.4 Making Scientific and Social Value Judgements About Value Sets -- 7.5 Adapting to Change -- 7.6 Concluding Remarks -- References -- Glossary of EQ-5D Terms -- References.
001896847
express
(Au-PeEL)EBL6938761
(MiAaPQ)EBC6938761
(OCoLC)1308799239

Zvolte formát: Standardní formát Katalogizační záznam Zkrácený záznam S textovými návěštími S kódy polí MARC